NETFLIX Has Not Only Replaced Commercial Television, The Premier Home Of Pop Culture, But It Is Also Continuing The Degenerate Depraved Social Engineering Of The Bernays/Freud Legacy.
From Sigmund Freud to Edward Bernays to Marc Bernays Randolph, the anti-human propaganda agenda continues on in the modern era.
Freud was a pedophile advocate, who taught that children sexually lusted after their parents. And that children who reported sexual abuse by adults had either imagined or fantasized the experience. He believed that women were the problem with society and all their problems stemmed from not having a penis.
Freudâs grandson, Sir Clement Freud has been accused of molesting multiple young girls and was suspected in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Sigmund Freudâs sister, Anna Freud whom Feud claimed was regularly molested and abused by their perverted father, gave birth to Freudâs nephew, Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda. Bernays took his familyâs work in psychology and used it to help governments and corporations manipulate the minds of the public.
Hired by the American tobacco company, Bernays manipulated women into buying more cigarettes, by convincing them that smoking was a form of feminist liberation. During this propaganda campaign, he dubbed cigarettes âTorches of Freedom.â
Thanks to Bernays and his familyâs twisted legacy, social engineering became big business. Modern psychology was used to exploit mankindâs mental weaknesses, nurture the publicâs lower desires and turned people into mindless consumers. Is it any surprise, then that the great-nephew of Edward Bernays is none other than Marc Bernays Randolph, the co-founder and original CEO of Netflix.
Does anyone really think that this is a coincidence? Netflix has not only replaced network television as the premiere home of pop culture, it is also continuing the degenerate, depraved social engineering of the Bernays-Freud legacy. In â13 Reasons Whyâ, Netflix was accused of romanticizing suicide during a recent increase of teenage suicide. In âThe Devil Next Doorâ, they were accused of re-writing history to deceive viewers into believing that Poland was responsible for establishing Nazi death camps. In âThe First Temptation of Christâ, Jesus Christ is depicted as a homosexual. And a Texas grand jury indicted Netflix for depicting child sex in the movie, âCutiesâ.
âNetflix and Chillâ. The new, preferred method for brainwashing the masses, brought to you by one of the most depraved, degenerate families of the modern era. Turn it off and wake up.
7 disturbing facts about Sigmund Freud
Warning. This might change your whole idea of who the âFather of Psychologyâ really was.
Say the name Freud and almost everyone will know who he is and the fundamental part he played in the creation of psychotherapy. That is, they will know the official image projected of him.
But few of us really know what kind of man he was, how he lived his life and what kind of thoughts and concepts he harbored.
For most people, when in need of help, they turn to what they believe to be the dubbed professionals in matters of health. They trust their minds and inner world to the professional and hope to come out of the session clearer and saner than before entering. But doesnât it matter what foundational theories the psychologist base their work on and what effects those theories might have on the treatment of those in need?
To become a psychologist or therapist one is obliged to enroll in university studies and graduate with a degree. During these studies the student is made to study and memorize the theories of the founding father, Sigmund Freud. His theories are neatly compiled in edited and reviewed textbooks. What these textbooks intentionally exclude though, are the dark and destructive aspects of his practices and theories.
But does it really serve society to cover up the nasty bits and only present the presentable parts? How are we to make informed decisions when the full truth is not available to us?
1. Avid drug user
An enthusiastic user and promoter of cocaine, he used the substance frequently until his death in 1939. In fact, he was so fond of the drug he actively distributed it among his friends and associates which in some cases resulted in drug addiction, as with with close friend Ernst von Fleischl-Marxow.
2. Defender of child molestation
As Freud embarked on the journey of psychoanalysis he came across numerous cases of so called hysterical individuals that showed alarming symptoms and behaviors in adult age. Unsurprisingly most of his patients in the mid-1890s reported early childhood sexual abuse. Initially he proposed that most mental illnesses were related to early sexual abuse (known as the seduction theory) but a couple of years later he took a 180 degree turn and instead concluded that his patients memories of sexual abuse were mere fantasies and completely made up. The new theory instead was named infantile sexuality.
He actually, seriously presented a theory where the cause was not adults preying on children but that the child itself is lusting over his/her parents and seeking bodily/sexual pleasure thereof.
As the Internet Encyclopedia of Psychology describes it: âFrom his account of the instincts or drives it followed that from the moment of birth the infant is driven in his actions by the desire for bodily/sexual pleasure, where this is seen by Freud in almost mechanical terms as the desire to release mental energy. Initially, infants gain such release, and derive such pleasure, from the act of sucking. Freud accordingly terms this the âoralâ stage of development. This is followed by a stage in which the locus of pleasure or energy release is the anus, particularly in the act of defecation, and this is accordingly termed the âanalâ stage. Then the young child develops an interest in its sexual organs as a site of site of pleasure (the âphallicâ stage), and develops a deep sexual attraction for the parent of the opposite sex, and a hatred of the parent of the same sex (the âOedipus complexâ).
So the kids are fantasizing sexually over their parents and thatâs why they have distresses in adult age⌠oh, thats why…
Talk about total gaslighting.
3. Serious women issues
His relationship to women was disturbed, to say the least and he never really developed any kind of healthy relationships with a significant other. He considered women to be weak, vain, jealous and lacking a good sense of justice. He believed that womenâs problems in essence stemmed from them not having a penis. He even went as far as claiming that women are the problem in society. Nice.
In fact, a lot points towards him having more than just âfriendlyâ relationships with his male friends and judging by letter correspondence uncovered with for example Wilhelm Fliess it appears the relationship was passionate, intimate and most probably of homosexual nature. In a letter written as a response to an acquaintance that shared that he had dreamed of Freud naked he responded, âYou probably imagine that I have secrets quite other than those I have reserved for myself, or you believe that (my secret) is connected with a special sorrow, whereas I feel capable of handling everything and am pleased with the resultant greater independence that comes from having overcome my homosexuality,ââ.
4. Generational abuse in the family
Itâs a little known fact that Freudâs father molested his own children and that they all showed distinct symptom of distress and trauma. Something that troubled Freud deeply and probably another reason as to why he dropped the seduction theory and proposed the infantile sexuality theory. A convenient way of explaining away abuse.
As he writes in one of his letters during a time when he was engaging in self psychoanalysis. ââUnfortunately, my own father was one of these perverts and is responsible for the hysteria of my brother (all of whose symptoms are identifications) and those of several younger sisters.ââ
Today its commonly understood that victims of sexual abuse, when not having addressed and resolved the trauma, tend to in higher frequencies pass on the violence to the next generation.
Freuds first and favorite daughter Anna showed signs of distress and mental illness which later gave her the description of a âjealous, depressed, masochistic, anorectic, latent-homosexual teenagerâ. In early adolescence she developed a severe psychopathology, consisting of sado-masochistic fantasies accompanied by compulsive masturbation, an eating disorder, and depression. Symptoms of child abuse anyone?
5. Relentless addict
Smoking up to 20 cigarettes a day he eventually developed mouth cancer 1923. For the next 16 years he went through a whooping 33 surgeries and had a large prosthesis inserted to separate his sinus and jaw. Despite all of this, he never stopped smoking and consequently that nasty habit led to his death.
6. In safe hands?
In the book ââThe Assault on the Truth, Freudâs Suppression of the Seduction Theory,ââ by author Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson he courageously presents chocking new material from letters and documents issued by Freud and his circle. Mr Masson should know, he was formerly the project director for the Sigmund Freud Archives and was to become its next director, but was dismissed in 1981 in a dispute over interpretation of other controversial Freud material. As the brave man he is he choose to not keep quiet about the information he came across and at the expense of his own career he instead spoke the truth on the matter.
Several disturbing facts have been unraveled under his research such as:
1.A patient treated by him in 1900 and then dismissed as a case of paranoia ended up hanging herself in a hotel room.
2.Freud was overly preoccupied and lustful over money. In one letter he wrote that money is ââlaughing gas for me.ââ
3.On numerous occasions he attempted to manipulate his clients into donating money to him, in effect abusing the trust given. In an article published in New York Times its revealed âIn one little-known case that barely missed becoming a major scandal, researchers say, Freud induced two patients to divorce their spouses and marry each other. In addition, he hinted that the man should make a generous donation to his psychoanalytic fund.â
How professional.
7. Something to hide?
Much of the coveted Freud material held by the Freud Archives still remains unavailable to scholars. This includes at least 75,000 items stored in the United States Library of Congress and to which public access has been prohibited, in some cases, into the 22d century. One might wonder what the Freud estate has to hide, going though such extreme measurements to keep such a large quantity of documents secret to the public.
As seen above the father of psychotherapy could hardly be considered a healthy, balanced man with good morals and wholesome behaviors. If he was practicing today he would surely be robbed of his license and questioned for his dubious behaviors. As we move forward in our meetings with the school of psychology, it is helpful to have the whole picture.
A healthy dose of common sense and critical standpoint is appropriate to apply for both the practitioners of Freudian theories and the recipients.
Netflix is normalizing pedophilia
Netflix Cartoon Pushes Pedophilia, Sexualizes Kids, Demonic Hollywood Trash
Netflix goes all-in for pedophilia with new âDancing Queenâ series that glorifies the sexualization of children
Netflix: Pandering to pedophiles everywhere
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/20/netflix-pandering-pedophiles-everywhere/
All the more reason to cancel. Is there a cultural revolution taking place right before our very eyes?
Is there an agenda to normalize pedophilia? You be the judge.
If you want to view the “Big Mouth” trailer from Netflix, click on the link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTC7wQMHHEA
*Update – You Tube Deleted The Link This Link Is Archived Here Though https://archive.ph/jJLLD
The Grand-Uncle of the Co-Founder of Netflix on Propaganda
Intelligent men must realize that propaganda is the modern instrument by which they can fight for productive ends and help to bring order out of chaosâŚThose who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. âŚWe are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. âŚIn almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of personsâŚwho understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind. â Edward Bernays, Propaganda (1928), pp. 9-10 This originally appeared in a Reddit post by user 7katalan, which is being reproduced below for archival purposes.
The Netflix Connections
TL;DR: Netflixâs two founders are heavily related to those in fields of weaponry and war, information, signalling and detection, television, politics, brain waves, public broadcasting, intelligence agencies, psychology, and propaganda. THIS IS PROBABLY NOT A COINCIDENCE. Iâve been thinking a lot recently about how Netflix has a lot of really fucked up programming that seems designed to enculture us to certain things. Prison being fun is a big one Iâve been noticing. So I was looking up their original shows and thought it was strange that their very first bit of original programming was House of Cards. Then I decided to look up the founders and HOO BOY does it get fucked up. It was founded by Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph. The first of the founders, Hastings, is the great-grandson of Alfred Lee Loomis and Ellen Holman Farnsworth. Loomis was an investment banker and scientist involved in development of radar and the atomic bomb, and also helped develop the electroencephalogram and studied brain waves with it. His laboratory was a meeting place for many very famous scientists like Einstein, Fermi, Bohr, Heisenberg. His cousin was Henry L. Stimson, the Secretary of War for Taft, FDR, and Truman, and Secretary of State for Hoover, and who oversaw the Manhattan Project which created the atomic bomb. One of Alfred Lee Loomisâ childrenâHenry Loomis, Reed Hastingsâ grand-uncle, was the director for the Voice of America under Eisenhower, and president of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting under Nixon, both of which are public broadcast arms of the U.S. government (foreign and domestic, respectively.) . Henry Loomis also directed research for the United States Information Agency and served on the board of the Mitre Corporation, who worked with the CIA and DoD. Alfred Lee Loomis also predicted the Great Depression and bought a ton of gold beforehand, then got even richer by buying the stocks of companies at their lowest. In a final point that I need to confirm his wife, Ellen Holman Farnsworth, has the same surname as Philo Farnsworth, inventor of the television, and Iâm pretty sure they are related. The second founder, Randolph, has connections that are perhaps even crazier. His great-granduncle is Sigmund fucking Freud, pioneer of psychology, who studied unconscious desires that control people, the effects of trauma, the effects of childhood incidents, etc. Even more insane is Randolphâs grand-uncle, Edward Bernays, an Austrian-American who was heavily involved in the field of propaganda, and who basically started the modern field of âpublic relationsâ. He worked in PR for the United Fruit Company, who was involved with the CIAâs overthrow of Guatemalaâs democratically elected government in 1954. Here are some quotes about how Bernays felt about propaganda and the common man (direct quotes in bold): âBernays argued that the covert use of third parties was morally legitimate because those parties were morally autonomous actors.â âIf we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it? The recent practice of propaganda has proved that it is possible, at least up to a certain point and within certain limits.â He later called this scientific technique of opinion-molding the engineering of consent*.â *âThis phrase quite simply means the use of an engineering approachâthat is, action based only on thorough knowledge of the situation and on the application of scientific principles and tried practices to the task of getting people to support ideas and programs.ââinstead of a mind, universal literacy has given [the common man] a rubber stamp, a rubber stamp inked with advertising slogans, with editorials, with published scientific data, with the trivialities of tabloids and the profundities of history, but quite innocent of original thought. Each manâs rubber stamp is the twin of millions of others, so that when these millions are exposed to the same stimuli, all receive identical imprintsâŚThe amazing readiness with which large masses accept this process is probably accounted for by the fact that no attempt is made to convince them that black is white. Instead, their preconceived hazy ideas that a certain gray is almost black or almost white are brought into sharper focus. Their prejudices, notions, and convictions are used as a starting point, with the result that they are drawn by a thread into passionate adherence to a given mental picture.â âBernaysâ vision was of a utopiansociety in which individualsâ dangerous libidinal energies, the psychic and emotional energy associated with instinctual biological drives that Bernays viewed as inherently dangerous, could be harnessed and channeled by a corporate elite for economic benefit. Through the use of mass production, big business could fulfill the cravings of what Bernays saw as the inherently irrational and desire-driven masses, simultaneously securing the niche of a mass-production economy (even in peacetime), as well as sating what he considered to be dangerous animal urges that threatened to tear society apart if left unquelled. Bernays touted the idea that the âmassesâ are driven by factors outside their conscious understanding, and therefore that their minds can and should be manipulated by the capable few: âIntelligent men must realize that propaganda is the modern instrument by which they can fight for productive ends and help to bring order out of chaosâŚThose who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. âŚWe are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. âŚIn almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of personsâŚwho understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.â âPropaganda was portrayed as the only alternative to chaos.â Sound like coincidences to you?
Margo Kaplan: Pedophilia Is Biological and Not a Choice
âŚby Jonas E. Alexis
Pedophilia is no longer a choice, says Margo Kaplan of Rutgers University. It is simply a mental illness and seems to be biological. Kaplan proceeds to say that pedophilia has
âneurological origins. Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. M.R.I.s of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains.
âMen with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause. Some findings also suggest that disturbances in neurodevelopment in utero or early childhood increase the risk of pedophilia.
âStudies have also shown that men with pedophilia have, on average, lower scores on tests of visual-spatial ability and verbal memory.â[1]
I certainly would love to see those studies and how those researchers arrive at those conclusions. As we shall see in a moment, Kaplan was quick to formulate a morally deficient idea but quickly stay away from its implications in the political and historical world. It is like Einstein postulating that âI know that philosophically a murderer is not responsible for his crime, but I prefer not to take tea with him.â[2]
I simply could not hold my laugher after I read Einsteinâs hysterical statement here. Didnât Einstein left Germany on the eve of the Third Reich? Didnât he say that âBecause of Hitler, I donât dare step on German soilâ?[3] Didnât Einstein view Hitler as a âcold, barbaric, animalistic resolutenessâ?[4]
If Hitler was not responsible, why do the Dreadful Few hate him so much? Why canât they understand people like Ernst Zundel who happen to admire Hitler?
Kaplan locks herself in the same kind of argument, which is intellectually vacuous and morally repugnant. She argues that pedophiles âremain responsible for their conduct.â[5] Yet in the same paragraphâyes, same paragraph!âKaplan moves on to say that people âdo not choose to be pedophiles.â[6]
How in the world can they be held accountable for their actions? And doesnât responsibility entail the power to choose?
Here Kaplan and genetic theorists (those who believe that Jewish behavior is genetic and not moral) run into the same moral and philosophical problem. They both end up saying indirectly that the mistake of the typist is not the typistâs mistakeâa logically impossible and impressively incoherent argument from which moral death inexorably flows.
To be fair, I contacted Kaplan to get her response, and it was pretty obvious that she was running away from the implications of her article. She quickly admitted that she did not write the title of the article, but the principles which flow from the essay are right in line with the title itself. In one particular response, she brought up a point which indirectly and subtly destroys the Holocaust project:
âYou are confusing pedophilia (the attraction) with child abuse (the act)âŚPedophilia is not the act. It is the attraction. The attraction is not chosen. The act is chosen. You are not morally responsible for your attraction. You are morally responsible for your act.â
Kaplan, of course, did not deal with other definitions of pedophilia, which include: âSexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object.â
In any event, I would grant her premise, which goes like this: âOne can live with pedophilia and not act on it.â[7] But the real question which I pointed out to her is this: âWhy do we begin and end at pedophilia?â Why donât we explore this idea in other possible worlds?
Kaplanâs logic was that since pedophilia is an attraction, it cannot be a crime if the attraction remains a thought. Kaplan did not know that she was undermining her own mines.
What about people who have âillicitâ and âperverseâ thoughts on the so-called Holocaust and express those thoughts out loud without acting upon them? Why are they being persecuted when they have not acted upon their thoughts?
Why have Jewish thought police such as Alan Dershowitz literally stripped people like Norman Finkelstein of their livelihood for having âillicitâ thoughts on Dershowitz and the whole Zionist project?
Again, why has my good friend Fredrick Toben been literally humiliated and imprisoned for just thinking that the Holocaust establishment has hijacked serious history and scholarship? Why has he been punished for simply asking historical questions and making rational points such as,
âShow me the evidence and Iâll believe you completelyâmy philosophical training does not allow me to accept extraordinary claims without rigorous testing and irrefutable evidenceâ?
How did the Dreadful Few end up holding the Germans by the balls and criminalizing anyone who even probes serious questions about the Holocaust narrative?
Why did Steven Salaita get fired from his academic position? Why did Denis Rancourt get fired after teaching at the University of Ottawa for more 25 years as a physicist? Why has Bishop Williamson been charged for saying that no Jew was gassed in a gas chamber?
If you want to view the “Big Mouth” trailer from Netflix, click on the link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTC7wQMHHEA
*Update – You Tube Deleted The Link This Link Is Archived Here Though https://archive.ph/jJLLD
To push the envelope even further, why has Ernst Zundel been literally crushed by the Dreadful Few for his thoughts on Nazi Germany and the Holocaust? If Zundel and others suffer from some kind of âmental disorder,â should not Kaplan make a case arguing that we ought to protect them and not burn down their houses or harass them?
Zundel lived in Canada for more than 40 years, but the government refused to give him citizenship because he had committed one of the most horrible crimes in history: he denied the Holocaust narrative.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, Zundel incited âracial hatredâ in Canada. Let us suppose that this was true. If we use Kaplanâs logic, Zundel never acted on that thought and he has not committed any crime. So, he needs protection. Will Kaplan help?
Perhaps what angered the SPLC was that Zundel had some âperverseâ thoughts on the Jews:
âThe Jews are particularly adept at seizing or insinuating themselves into strategic positions in our society where they wield power far beyond the extent of their numbers.â
Once again, suppose we place this thought in the category of âmental disorder.â Where, then, is Kaplan? Isnât she supposed to defend people who have âmental disordersâ?
Zundel would not be the only person on the planet to suffer from this kind of disease. Jewish historian Yuri Slezkine does have the same âmental disorderâ when he postulates in the first paragraph and on the first page of his study The Jewish Century that
âThe modern age is the Jewish Age, and the twentieth century, in particular, is the Jewish CenturyâŚModernization, in other words, is about everyone becoming Jewish.â[8]
In the same vein, Jewish propagandist Edward Bernays, known as âthe father of public relationsâ[9] and whose uncle was none other than Sigmund Freud, declares that âwe are dominated by the relatively small number of personsâa trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty millionâwho understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses.â
America, according to Bernays, is like a scientific lab, where people are being experimented like animals. Who are âthe scientistsâ? Bernays moves on to say that they are âinvisible governorsâ who covertly âpull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.â[10]
Bernays took the Jewish cat out of the bag when he said:
âIf we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it? The recent practice of propaganda has proved that it is possible, at least up to a certain point and within certain limits.â[11]
The war in Iraq proved that Bernays was right. The Dreadful Few used propaganda to sell the poison to the American peopleâand this will cost us all at least six trillion dollars.
So, the twentieth century alone proves that Bernaysâ theory was true: the rich and the powerful, namely the Dreadful Few, began to control and manipulate the masses for their diabolical end.
Slezkine, who is a Russian Jew, got great accolades for publishing The Jewish Century (Princeton University). Bernaysâ book is still in circulation. Zundel, however, has been imprisoned, harassed, and beaten for basically saying almost the same thing that Slezkine and Bernays have articulated. Zundel said,
âI was incarcerated in six different prisons on two continents in three countriesâthe USA, Canada, and Germanyâwithout relief of any kind. Throughout my imprisonment, basic human rights principles were trampled underfoot repeatedly and with impunity.
âThe worst prisons were the Canadian detention centers at Thorold, Ontario and at Toronto West, where I was held for two long years in isolation cells, ice-cold in the winter, no shoes or socks allowed. The electric light in these cells, bright enough to be able to read, was kept on 24 hours a day.
âThrough a glass slot in the door I was checked every 20 minutes, and my activities were meticulously noted by the guards: one sheet for every day. No dignity, no privacy.
âMy toothbrush was kept in a plastic bin in a hall. I was not allowed to speak to other prisoners. Bed sheets were changed only after three months. No pillows. No chairs.
âWhen I wrote to my wife or to my attorneys, I had to sit on a makeshift pile of my court transcripts. No radio, no television, not even an electrical outlet to sharpen my pencils. No ball point pens, only pencil stubs, cut in half with a saw. No spoons, forks, or knives were permitted; only a white plastic spoon with a fork called a âsporkâ that had to be returned every time at the end of the meal.
âWith very few exceptions when furtive guards showed me some kindness away from the surveillance cameras, I was treated as though I was the worst of criminals. Thatâs Canada for you, where I have lived and worked without a criminal record for more than 40 years.â[12]
The SPLC has a section on their website entitled, Zundelâs âCriminal History,â which includes ââknowingly publishing false newsâ in connection with his pro-Nazi propaganda.â The ADL declares that people like Zundel are âpoisoning the web.â Again, will Kaplan write an article defending those people?
As it turns out, Kaplan does not seem to lack moral sophistication to address those important issues. She is a law professor and was certainly trained in logic. But her weltanschauung, which is Jewish and essentially Talmudic, does not allow her to see the obvious. It is no surprise that she never tackled those issues in our correspondence.
For Kaplan, pedophilia is not a moral choice but a âmental illness,â which she says is compatible with the definition of âmental disabilities.â Kaplan continues, âOur currently law is inconsistent and irrational.â[13]
How?
Well, in order to understand Kaplanâs weltanschauung better, one needs to go back to what she has written in the past. In 2013, she declared in the Washington Post:
â[O]ur courts and legislatures are still strangely squeamish about sexual pleasure, tending to treat it as a topic to be avoided or an immoral indulgence the state should prevent.
âWhen they address sex, they often reveal their embarrassment by using Victorian-sounding euphemisms such as âan intimate relation of husband and wifeâ or awkwardly clinical terms such as âthe physical act.â Other times, they express outright disgust.â[14]
The courts are âsqueamish about sexual pleasureâ? Kaplan is trying to be clumsy here because no court denies sexual pleasure. What she meant by âsexual pleasureâ was same-sex marriage or âthe criminalization of sadomasochistic activities.â[15]
Kaplan concludes her Washington Post article by saying, âIâd like to think that courts, legislatures and voters are up to the challenge. So, letâs talk about sex.â[16]
Again, why doesnât she move that âfree speechâ argument elsewhere? Do the Dreadful Few allow free speech when it comes to examining the Holocaust, Zionism, Israelâs extermination of the Palestinians? Why have Jewish Neocons and others equated anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism?[17] Why has the Israeli-run NSA been snooping on virtually much of the entire world? Will Kaplan ever address those issues in a future article?
Kaplan concludes her New York Times article by saying,
âAcknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children from harm.â[18]
Kaplan, whether she likes it or not, is indirectly proposing an idea that can only work for her Jewish brethren. If pedophilia and its offshoots are not crimes, then people like Dominique Strauss-Kahn,[19] Brian Singer,[20] Woody Allen,[21] and perhaps even Alan Dershowitz[22] can get away with their immoral acts.
Harvey Weinstein for example (thanks to a reader who pointed this out) has been accused of groping a 22-year old Italian model in his office. But if this behavior has a biological origin, how are we going to hold him accountable? It gets worse. Listen to this:
âRabbi Nuchem Rosenbergâwho is 63 with a long, graying beardârecently sat down with me to explain what he described as a âchild-rape assembly lineâ among sects of fundamentalist Jews. He cleared his throat. âIâm going to be graphic,â he saidâŚ
ââI opened a door that entered into a schvitz,â he told me. âVapors everywhere, I can barely see. My eyes adjust, and I see an old man, my age, long white beard, a holy-looking man, sitting in the vapors. On his lap, facing away from him, is a boy, maybe seven years old. And the old man is having anal sex with this boy.âRabbi Rosenberg paused, gathered himself, and went on:
ââThis boy was speared on the man like an animal, like a pig, and the boy was saying nothing. But on his faceâfear. The old man [looked at me]without any fear, as if this was common practice. He didnât stop.
âI was so angry, I confronted him. He removed the boy from his penis, and I took the boy aside. I told this man, âItâs a sin before God, a mishkovzucher. What are you doing to this boyâs soul? Youâre destroying this boy!â
ââHe had a sponge on a stick to clean his back, and he hit me across the face with it. âHow dare you interrupt me!â he said. I had heard of these things for a long time, but now I had seen.â
One rabbi even
âforced his victims to eat feces, claiming that this cruelty was necessary to âpurifyâ the children he abused.â
Rosenberg continues to be graphic:
âI have children come to me with their parents, and the blood is coming out of the anus. These are zombies for life.â
We know that pedophilia is a big issue among ultra-Orthodox Jews. Back in 2008, the Jewish Daily Forward reported,
âSexual abuse of children has periodically arisen in the ultra-Orthodox community through high-profile cases like that of Yehuda Kolko and Avrohom Mondrowitz, a teacher and a youth counselor, respectively, who were accused of abusing their students.
âLeaders in the community told the Forward that they generally treated those cases as isolated incidents. But both the Kolko and Mondrowitz cases have bubbled back up, and in the past few months a number of community leaders have forcefully taken the issue to a new plane.
âPerhaps the most influential voice has been of Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind, who over the past year â and, particularly, over the past two months â has started a somewhat personal campaign and argued that the ultra-Orthodox community has become a haven for child molestersâŚ
âThe largely Brooklyn-based ultra-Orthodox community, which spans many different sects, has seen a handful of explosive cases, beginning with that of Mondrowitz, who was indicted in Brooklyn on five counts of sodomy and six counts of sexual abuse in 1985, but fled to Israel during the scrutiny.â[23]
In short, pedophilia is a not a crime for the Dreadful Few, but it is a crime for Catholic priests. Listen very carefully to the words of Jewish medical doctor Gustav Schonfeld,
âWhen these priestly misbehaviors, which in fact are punishable crimes, were brought to the attention of their priestly supervisors, the bishops either did nothing, counseled the priests in house, or sent them to friendly psychologists or psychiatrists for treatment, and forgave them their sins.
âThen, the Church transferred the priests to other parishes or schools where they had continuing access to children for abuse. The crimes were not reported to the police. Somehow the stories leaked out and created a media storm. Hundreds of children reported having been abusedâŚ
âRecently, similar reports have emanated from Europe. One particularly disturbing set of news stories reported that the current pope permitted more than one pedophile priest to continue contact with children. The size of the legal costs in Europe for the Church is not yet known.â[24]
Isnât that lovely? Here is a man who keeps pointing out that Catholic pedophilia is wrong but has written zero articles on Jewish pedophilia. And he wants us to take him seriously! Moreover, he forgot to tell his readers that the Dreadful Few were very influential in the sexualiztion of the West and even Catholic priests.[25] As E. Michael Jones pointed out,
âthe trouble started in the â60s with the sexualization of the culture in general and the culture of the Catholic clergy in particular. Carl Rogers set out to liberate the Immaculate Heart order in Los Angeles, and the result was Lesbian Nuns. The same sort of thing happened at Notre Dame summer schools for the clergy during the â60sâŚ
âWhen it comes to sexual abuse, the rich Jew is innocent until proven guilty, but the Catholic priest is guilty until proven innocent. The same legal system that is used to exonerate Woody Allen is used to destroy Catholic priests. The double standard is impossible to ignore.â[26]
Jones meticulously documents that Catholic priests largely got seduced by the sexual philosophy of Wilhelm Reich, who postulated that quite explicitly that masturbation and sexual corruption could be used to destroy the Catholic Church.
When Catholic priests began to mimic the sexual mores of their oppressors, it was an infallible sign that they were on the brink of prostrating before the enemies of all mankind and therefore lost their moral ground. Once that was done, a flood of sexual misbehavior came on the scene, which largely destroyed the effectiveness of the Church in the culture.[27] As Jones continues to point out,
âThe next fatal step occurred when the Church substituted counseling for traditional Church discipline. This was a major source of the problem in Chicago.
âWhen âa 13-year-old boy reported in 1979 that a priest raped him and later threatened him at gunpoint to keep quiet,â the Archdiocese of Chicago did not investigate the matter and punish the perpetrator.
âInstead, they âassured the boyâs parents that . . . the cleric would receive treatment and have no further contact with minors.ââ[28]
Put simply, Kaplan is implicitly treading on Wilhelm Reichâs philosophy with a slightly different spin. But the end result is always the same. Reich wanted to change the sexual milieu and even entitled one of his books The Sexual Revolution. Kaplan is now asking for âsexual pleasure.â In other words, the West had to wait for thousands of years to learn about sexual pleasure from Kaplan.
Didnât we learn our lesson from Oscar Wilde, Michel Foucault, Friedrich Nietzsche, Arthur Schopenhauer, Guy de Maupassant, Gustave Flaubert, Jean Paul Sartre, and even Franz Shubert[29]?
[1] Margo Kaplan, âPedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime,â NY Times, October 5, 2014. Thanks to Laura Lee Solomon for sending me Kaplanâs article.
[2] Quoted in Walter Isaacson, Enstein: His Life and Universe (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008), 393.
[3] Ibid., 404.
[4] Quoted in Jurgen Neffe, Einstein: A Biography (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2005), 287.
[5] Quoted in Victor Fiorillo, âQ&A: Rutgers Law Professor Who Says Pedophilia Is Not a Crime,â Philadelphia Magazine, October 6, 2014.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Margo Kaplan, âPedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime,â NY Times, October 5, 2014.
[8] Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 1.
[9] âEdward Bernays, âFather of Public Relationsâ And Leader in Opinion Making, Dies at 103,â NY Times, March 10, 1995.
[10] Edward Bernays, Propaganda (New York: Ig Publishing, 1928), 38; For cultural history on this, see E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (South Bend: St. Augustineâs Press, 2000).
[11] Bernays, Propaganda, 71.
[12] Kourosh Ziabari, âTesting the Limits of Freedom of Speech: Ernst Zundel Speaks Out,â Foreign Policy Journal, April 30, 2010.
[13] Kaplan, âPedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime,â NY Times, October 5, 2014
[14] Margo Kaplan, âWhy the Law Should Recognize the Joy of Sex,â Washington Post, November 22, 2013.
[15] Ibid.
[16] Ibid.
[17] Sam Sokol, âAnti-Zionism Is Anti-Semitism, Says TAU Director,â Jerusalem Post, May 21, 2014; Robert Wistrich, Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism,â Jewish Political Studies Review, Fall 2004; Emanuele Ottolenghi, âAnti-Zionism Is Anti-Semitism,â Guardian, November 29, 2003; Judea Pearl, âIs Anti-Zionism Hate?,â LA Times, March 15, 2009; Eylon Aslan-Levy, âWhy Anti-Zionism Is Inherently Anti-Semitic,â Times of Israel, December 8, 2013.
[18] Kaplan, âPedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime,â NY Times, October 5, 2014
[19] âDominique Strauss-Kahn DNA âlinked to maid,ââ BBC, May 24, 2011; Philippe Sotto, âStrauss-Kahn Denies He Knew The Women At His Orgies Were Prostitutes,â Huffington Post, February 10, 2015; Dan Bilefsky, âDominique Strauss-Kahnâs Defense: He Didnât Know Prostitutes Were at the Orgies,â NY Times, February 10, 2015.
[20] Ted Johnson, ââX-Menâ Director Bryan Singer Accused of Sexually Abusing Teenage Boy,â Variety Magazine, April 16, 2014; Anthony McCartney, âBryan Singer Accused Of Sexually Assaulting Underage Boy,â Huffington Post, April 17, 2014.
[21] See for example E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 996-1003; 1007-1010; E. Michael Jones, âWoody Allen and the Double Standard,â Culture Wars, March 2014.
[22] âAlan Dershowitz Denies Sexual Assault Allegations As âA Complete And Total Lie,ââ Huffington Post, January 3, 2015; Ann Oldenburg, âDershowitz on sex slave case: âIâm hiding nothing,ââ USA Today, January 23, 2015.
[23] See for example Lana Gersten, âHaredim Begin Confronting Pedophilia,â Jewish Daily Forward, October 2, 2008.
[24] Gustav Schonfeld, âPedophilia, the Pope and the Jews,â History News Network, April 26, 2010.
[25] For a cultural history on this, see E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (South Bend: St. Augustineâs Press, 2000).
[26] E. Michael Jones, âWoody Allen and the Double Standard,â Culture Wars, March 2014.
[27] See for example Patrick Guinan, âModern Psychology and Priest Sex Abuse,â Culture Wars, May 2004.
[28] E. Michael Jones, âWoody Allen and the Double Standard,â Culture Wars, March 2014.
[29] See for example Franz Schubert, The Music and the Man (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999).
The Century of the Self – Part 1: “Happiness Machines”
The story of the relationship between Sigmund Freud and his American nephew, Edward Bernays. Bernays invented the public relations profession in the 1920s and was the first person to take Freud’s ideas to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations how they could make people want things they didn’t need by systematically linking mass-produced goods to their unconscious desires.
Bernays was one of the main architects of the modern techniques of mass-consumer persuasion, using every trick in the book, from celebrity endorsement and outrageous PR stunts, to eroticising the motorcar.
His most notorious coup was breaking the taboo on women smoking by persuading them that cigarettes were a symbol of independence and freedom. But Bernays was convinced that this was more than just a way of selling consumer goods. It was a new political idea of how to control the masses. By satisfying the inner irrational desires that his uncle had identified, people could be made happy and thus docile.
It was the start of the all-consuming self which has come to dominate today’s world.
Originally broadcast on 29th April 2002.
Danny Boy Limerick
Danny Boy Limerick is viewer funded only.
If you appreciate the content of my website and would like to help keep me going,
please consider “tipping” me for my time invested in this project.
Thanks !
Website + Resources
@DannyBoyLimerick
Telegram: https://t.me/DannyBoyLimerickLive
The Shill Hunters (Group Chat) – https://t.me/TheGoodPeopleFightingGoodFight
New You Tube Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7GO_BP5py-JI76LWudOWMA/
Facebook Page DBL: https://www.facebook.com/dannyboylimerick2.0 (Censored Close To Unpublishing)
Facebook Page DBL 2.0: https://www.facebook.com/DannyBoyLimerick (Censored – Restricted Shadow Banned)
FB Profile: https://www.facebook.com/DBLProjectCounterintel (Banned Multiple Restrictions)
FB Profile: https://www.facebook.com/DannyBoyLimerickActive (Restricted For 90 Days)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DannyBLimerick
Mewe: https://mewe.com/i/dannyboylimerick
The Shills Hunters: https://mewe.com/join/theshillhunters (Shill Hunters Only)
Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/dannyboyeire
Gab: https://gab.com/DannyBoyLimerick
Minds: https://www.minds.com/register?referrer=LaurelGreenNeedleDan
PocketNet (Bastyon): https://pocketnet.app/dannyboylimerick?ref=PFD6mB3CHhXq7AStVgi5XpTQ1whaSJb2bn
Donate: https://dannyboylimerick.website/donate/
Website: http://DannyBoyLimerick.website
Landing Page (Linktree)
Hash: #opWeCanSeeYou
đŽđŞđâď¸
#OpWeCanSeeYou #DannyBoyLimerick #TheMostCensoredManInIreland
I am a one man operation that has been trying to filter through all the “New Aged” worldwide propaganda preached to the truth community / freedom fighters through fake “truth gurus/mentors”, so that i can bring you the “actual” truth. I have been doing this since 2016 and went mainstream in 2018.
These “wolves in sheeps clothing” are “planted” within the community as “Gatekeepers” to, sow division, utilize delay/deflect tactics misinform and mislead the “free-thinkers” or anyone that opposes the “Occultist Hidden Hand” or “Shadow Government” , straight to the slaughterhouse.
I would like to say thanks to all the fellow “watchmen”, “Shill Hunters” and “Genuine truthers/researchers/free thinkers” working tirelessly around the clock out there, putting yourself in the trenches, laying it all on the line by sounding the alarm over the last several years, sacrifices have been made, reputations tarnished, online friends and family members have been lost and lots more put on the back burner. You are the real warriors of the so called “End Times”. The unsung Heroes.
Nobody said it was going to be easy. Keep On Fighting The Good Fight.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains some copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to expose and advance the understanding of the issues covered here.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material.
Sources
https://rumble.com/vhlt4v-netflix-and-the-depraved-bernaysfreud-legacy.html
http://www.cabaltimes.com/2019/06/02/netflix/
Danny Boy Limerick
Danny Boy Limerick is viewer funded only.
If you appreciate the content of my website and would like to help keep me going,
please consider “tipping” me for my time invested in this project.
Thanks !
Website + Resources
@DannyBoyLimerick
Telegram: https://t.me/DannyBoyLimerickLive
The Shill Hunters (Group Chat) – https://t.me/TheGoodPeopleFightingGoodFight
New You Tube Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7GO_BP5py-JI76LWudOWMA/
Facebook Page DBL: https://www.facebook.com/dannyboylimerick2.0 (Censored Close To Unpublishing)
Facebook Page DBL 2.0: https://www.facebook.com/DannyBoyLimerick (Censored – Restricted Shadow Banned)
FB Profile: https://www.facebook.com/DBLProjectCounterintel (Banned Multiple Restrictions)
FB Profile: https://www.facebook.com/DannyBoyLimerickActive (Restricted For 90 Days)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DannyBLimerick
Mewe: https://mewe.com/i/dannyboylimerick
The Shills Hunters: https://mewe.com/join/theshillhunters (Shill Hunters Only)
Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/dannyboyeire
Gab: https://gab.com/DannyBoyLimerick
Minds: https://www.minds.com/register?referrer=LaurelGreenNeedleDan
PocketNet (Bastyon): https://pocketnet.app/dannyboylimerick?ref=PFD6mB3CHhXq7AStVgi5XpTQ1whaSJb2bn
Donate: https://dannyboylimerick.website/donate/
Website: http://DannyBoyLimerick.website
Landing Page (Linktree)
Hash: #opWeCanSeeYou
đŽđŞđâď¸
#OpWeCanSeeYou #DannyBoyLimerick #TheMostCensoredManInIreland
I am a one man operation that has been trying to filter through all the “New Aged” worldwide propaganda preached to the truth community / freedom fighters through fake “truth gurus/mentors”, so that i can bring you the “actual” truth. I have been doing this since 2016 and went mainstream in 2018.
These “wolves in sheeps clothing” are “planted” within the community as “Gatekeepers” to, sow division, utilize delay/deflect tactics misinform and mislead the “free-thinkers” or anyone that opposes the “Occultist Hidden Hand” or “Shadow Government” , straight to the slaughterhouse.
I would like to say thanks to all the fellow “watchmen”, “Shill Hunters” and “Genuine truthers/researchers/free thinkers” working tirelessly around the clock out there, putting yourself in the trenches, laying it all on the line by sounding the alarm over the last several years, sacrifices have been made, reputations tarnished, online friends and family members have been lost and lots more put on the back burner. You are the real warriors of the so called “End Times”. The unsung Heroes.
Nobody said it was going to be easy. Keep On Fighting The Good Fight.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains some copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to expose and advance the understanding of the issues covered here.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material.